Saturday, April 24, 2010

Architecture


Terraform, "Homeway"











Nicholas Lacey










Adam Kalkin








The City of Arts and Sciences, Valencia, Spain





Metropolitain Kansas City Preforming Arts Center







Patrick Blanc
(art and nature too)




1. How does housing mobility and recycled materials impact the longevity of the structure?


2. Do you think Daniel Buren's piece integrated well with the 17th century palace? Is it a permanent instillation?


3. How did Bauhaus change architecture and design in the United States? What was the feud about between Frank Lloyd Wright?
4. Should architecture "critique contemporary living and working enviornments....etc." (pg 322) when it is supposed to house us? Architecture is first functional, does it have to DO so much more?

Narrative and Representation


Kara Walker




Doho Sun











Marilyn daSilva










Melanie Bilenker

Questions:
1. Is it problematic to be too representational in narrative work?
2. Why ae Frida's paintings dismisses as being too personal? How has she contributed to art?
3. Discuss narratives in experiencial vs. object based art from the chapter.
4. What is the difference between allegory, pastiche and parody?
5. Look at the work in both the narrative and representation chapters. Do you see an overlap?

Deformity


Joel Peter Witkin







Diane Arbus








Laura Ferguson


Questions:
1. Is photography the best medium to express the "grotesque" as author Rachel Adams sad at the end of the chapter? What do you think about the "carte de visite" phenomenon and of the "freak" as celebrity?
2. Do you think the "freak" photography made people more comfortable with human deformities or did it objectify them as others? What was the impace of medical photography on "freak"photogaphy?
3. How has science changed opeple's view of people with deformities and subsequently how has it affected art?
4. Do you think Yayoi-Kusama's pieces are representative of "deformity" in art?
5. Is John Currin's work pastiche or parody?

Evaluation of Narrative and Deformity

Amy and I presented the chapters Narrative and Deformity. I thought the Narrative discussion went rather well. It took a while for the class to warm up, but when they finally did, the discussion was great. Class was coming to an end, and we had more material to cover, so we were well prepared. I couldn't believe it went so well, considering I raced to class from Newark.
We prepared even more for next presentation on Deformity. We met and spent hours talking about the presentation. The mistake I made was turning out the lights while we showed images. I also asked Amy if she would like to stand at the podeum with me that time. Both of these changes were spontanious and really effected the discussion. It made our talk seem more like a slide presentation and not a class discussion. So the students became really quite. We had a lot of material, but went through it much faster than the Narrative talk. I got nervous because the class was unresponsive, therefore I got quiet while Amy kept talking. So....never turn the lights out if you are going to have a class discussion.

Cry-teria

Criteria for an excellent art review:

1. A great art review is honest. The writer must speak from his/her own experience and report from the self, not influenced by larger outside agendas.

2. The review should compare the art show with previous shows. This demonstrates that the reviewer has perspective of art over a range of years, even in a region.

3. Part of being honest will give the reviewer personality. Sometimes you can pick up on sarcasm, jokes, or artist slams that make the read funny, controversial, or edgy.

4. If the reviewer has strong opinions about the show, he/she should back up the criticisum with reasons for their stance. Reviews that give a neutral overview of the event don't need such an explanation (an example would be a general review vs. a critical review).

5. The review should include artwork that the reviewer thinks is strong. The work and the artist should recieve this recongision. Work that is not strong should also be noted.

Thursday, April 15, 2010

MANIFESTO - Sarah Davis



This is not a report on what I think art is today. The assignment was to research what art is today from readings and research, and to look at actual art objects. I am not so trustworthy of my opinion/judgement in assessing art objects then and categorizing them in art of today. I don't want to regurgitate what I read because it just summarizes what the established writers, critics, historians, and theorists have said. If you want to know what art is today, read the text I am wearing as my clothing and jewelry, written by those professionals. I wear their knowledge, try it on for size and weight, and carry it with me, because I am required to do this in academia. To be honest, I didn’t know much about this stuff before I came to grad school, so I am starting from square one. I am an artist, and this is where I stand in art today, in this academic setting.

Monday, March 1, 2010

5 Questions/Responses, 3/1/10

1.The second paragraph on page 80 is depressing. Today's trends in fashion and music are no longer monumental and distinct as they were in past decades. We have brought back the bell bottom, then skinny jeans, retro and vintage was in too. I wonder, have we run out of styles? Is that possible? Are we trying to name the next art movement...the 'post post modern' or 'altermodern' or whatever...but are we really just in a long, slow evolving post modern state? Can you really see a difference in the art produce and shown in the Altermodern show (the book we had in class the other day)? Are we just re categorizing what has been happening in art?

2. A question from Nietzschean: "Are you willing to relive for all eternity the moments you are experiencing right now?" Well no. This very moment, I am reading this book, and I defiantly don't want this experience for eternity. Moments worth reliving are ones when a person feels pleasure, tranquility, joy, peace, rest, or excitement.
"The era of commitment has passed." Really? Is the era of commitment modernism? Are we in a way coming back to modernism in some ways? How?

3.Page 83 "Culture is being threatened when all worldly objects and things, produced in the past and present, are treated as mere functions for the life process of society, as though they are there only to fulfill some need." How can we say that about the past objects? What about stuff made before modernism, before the enlightenment or the industrial revolution? Those makers were unaware of todays globalization. Do we hold on to those objects for information? Why do we keep them. Bourriarud mentioned that we keep museum objects to store their data...?

4. Museums as a storage of data, not for appreciating the actual object. Will art become non-physical all together? Will it exist just as conceptual ideas, since we have an abundance of materials, both used and new. Although, we will soon run out of new materials.

5. Ok, on page 92, Bourriard mentions how the precariousness on contemporary are brings us closer to modernity. "For the omnipresence of precariousness in contemporary art inevitably pushes it back toward the source of modernity: the fleeting present moment, the shifting crowd, the street, and the ephemeral."

Sunday, February 28, 2010

Rirkrit Tiravanijas, "Less Oil More Courage"



Jason Rhoades


George Seurat, "A Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte"


John Miller, from "Middle of the Day"

Art:21 Allora & Calzadilla Interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5HE5uA_BGk





Monday, February 22, 2010


Sarah's FUNDRED

1. The quote on pg. 50 by Duchamp and the second paragraph on pg. 56 are disturbing. Clearly, Duchamp was aware of his roots when he cam to the US, or else he wouldn't be scared of them. He chose to be unattached to them, as talked about on pg. 56. Did he uproot only in his art? Although leaving his roots was freeing, like swimming, he really had the roots of the ivy, which HAS roots, and is able to bring along the tradition and replant. A person ALWAYS had roots, whether they are many, few, attached, not attached, tangled, growing, or dried up. The radical sounded more like a tree....being tall, strong, and stationary. The tree is firmly rooted in one belief, canopies over all, spying and judging, and not budging. So strong, but can be cut down. The fall is enormous.

2. About pg. 66. No, postcards are designed for tourists, they are not visions thought the eyes of the local people. The gulf war pics displayed on the news were chosen by TV networks with political agendas meant to sway the public by showing select images, giving people an inaccurate view of what was really going on. I don't think Paul Gauguin had that sort of agenda. I think it is interesting to see how an outsider would translate my world, because then I may see a different perspective. Why do we travel anyway? We must keep our images in our heads as did Daney?

3. About pg. 26. If the other artists from other countries were not influnced by Western evolution in art, why can't we critigue them based on their own evolution and history? They must have one? And what if they don't want to add in? Some don't want to on our turf.

4. About pg. 26. The idea we should dewesternize. Does Bourriaud argue how we could do this? Is it possible? What are we trying to save here? The world, art? Why do we have to be so in control?

5. I would like to discuss a section on pg. 31, about how "...film has been moving more toward the image...art has been going in the opposite direction..."

What does post production mean to me?

Well, I didn't know anything about it before this class. I have a limited opinion of it because it is new to me. I guess I am trying to define it, which is not the question. I think artists source nature and man made objects for their own work. We are inspired by anything and everything. The problem sourcing from another artist who doesn't want you to use their work, or corporations who want a buck from you. I don't have a problem with post production. Nothing is safe anymore...if you make home porn, you are taking the chance its going end up on the internet. To be continued...

Monday, February 15, 2010

Homework for 2/15/10


Daniel Pflumm



Thomas Lélu & Jean-Max Colard, Roue de vélo, After Marcel Duchamp, 2006



Michael Gumhold, Movement #1913–2007, 2007




Ji Lee, Duchamp Reloaded, 2009




Sherrie Levine, Fountian (After Marcel Duchamp), 1991




Shepard Fairey's Obama Hope poster



5 Questions/Comments:

1. Discuss the term "intellectual property" used by music industry lobbyist Rick Cairns. He says, "...the unique expression of love is (his) property. (He) wishes to own the rights to that property." Does he realize what he is saying? Does he want to profit from love, or control the expression when expressed by people? Both? What a horrible would that would be. We would all be emotionless, fearing being sited and charged for emoting.

2. Ideas are more valuable than gold."Wealth is in the products of the mind."...quote from RIP. The only place we cannot plug into at any given moment is the mind. What we think is contained in our heads, and nobody can see in. Although, now we have brain scans and technology that can see in...but not our thoughts. We have lie detectors, but they are not 100% fool proof. So, now, the idea that leads to a money making product, tangible or abstract, is what is valuable. Once it leaves the brain, there is fear it will be stolen be another.

3. On page 23 of Postproduction, there is a Marx reference: "man produces his own body, e.g., through feeding one form of consumption....a dress becomes really a dress only by being worn, a house which is uninhabited is indeed not really a house."
So, if it has not functioned for its intended use, it is not valid, or it is not worthy of the object title? If nobody is around to hear the tree fall in the forest, did it really make a sound? Back to consumption, can a person consume a person? Can an emotion be consumed?

4."...the moment of presentation is made sacred...we only look at what is well-presented; we only desire what is desired by others" from page 27 of Postproduction. This quote makes me think of the question above, #3. The art object is not yet art until it is viewed, but it also has to be well-presented, but it also has to be wanted by many people for it to be valid. Or valued.

5. The Cannibal Manifesto was published in 1928 by Brazilian poet and polemicist Oswald de Andrade. Its argument is that Brazil's history of "cannibalizing" other cultures is its greatest strength, while playing on the modernists' primitivist interest in cannibalism as an alleged tribal rite. Cannibalism becomes a way for Brazil to assert itself against European post-colonial cultural domination. (wikipidia)

The Cannibal Manifesto:

Only Cannibalism unites us. Socially. Economically. Philosophically.
The unique law of the world. The disguised expression of all individualisms, all collectivisms. Of all religions. Of all peace treaties.

Tupi or not tupi that is the question.

Against all catechisms. And against the mother of the Gracos.

I am only interested in what’s not mine. The law of men. The law of the cannibal.

We are tired of all those suspicious Catholic husbands in plays. Freud finished off the enigma of woman and the other recent psychological seers.

What dominated over truth was clothing, an impermeable layer between the interior world and the exterior world. Reaction against people in clothes. The American cinema will tell us about this.

Sons of the sun, mother of living creatures. Fiercely met and loved, with all the hypocrisy of longing: importation, exchange, and tourists. In the country of the big snake.

It’s because we never had grammatical structures or collections of old vegetables. And we never knew urban from suburban, frontier country from continental. Lazy on the world map of Brazil.

One participating consciousness, one religious rhythm.

Against all the importers of canned conscience. For the palpable existence of life. And let Levy-Bruhl go study prelogical mentality.

We want the Cariba Revolution. Bigger than the French Revolution. For the unification of all the efficient revolutions for the sake of human beings. Without us, Europe would not even have had its paltry declaration of the rights of men.

The golden age proclaimed by America. The golden age. And all the girls.

Filiation. The contact with the Brazilian Cariba Indians. Ou Villegaignon print terre. Montaigne. Natural man. Rousseau. From the French Revolution to Romanticism, to the Bolshevik Revolution, to the Surrealist Revolution and the technological barbarity of Keyserling. We’re moving right along.

We were never baptized. We live with the right to be asleep. We had Christ born in Bahia. Or in Belem do Pata.

But for ourselves, we never admitted the birth of logic.

Against Father Vieira, the Priest. Who made our first loan, to get a commission. The illiterate king told him: put this on paper but without too much talk. So the loan was made. Brazilian sugar was accounted for. Father Vieira left the money in Portugal and just brought us the talk.

The spirit refuses to conceive spirit without body. Anthropomorphism. Necessity of cannibalistic vaccine. For proper balance against the religions of the meridian. And exterior inquisitions.

We can only be present to the hearing world.

We had the right codification of vengeance. The codified science of Magic. Cannibalism. For the permanent transformation of taboo into totem.

Against the reversible world and objectified ideas. Made into cadavers. The halt of dynamic thinking. The individual a victim of the system. Source of classic injustices. Of romantic injustices. And the forgetfulness of interior conquests.

Screenplays. Screenplays. Screenplays. Screenplays. Screenplays. Screenplays. Screenplays.

Cariba instinct.

Death and life of hypotheses. From the equation I coming from the Cosmos to the axiom Cosmos coming from the I. Subsistence. Knowledge. Cannibalism.

Against the vegetable elites. In communication with solitude.

We were never baptized. We had the Carnival. The Indian dressed as a Senator of the Empire. Acting the part of Pitt. Or playing in the operas of Alencar with many good Portuguese feelings.

We already had communism. We already had a surrealist language. The golden age.

Catiti Catiti
Imara Notia
Notia Imara
Ipeju*

Magic and life. We had relations and distribution of fiscal property, moral property, and honorific property. And we knew how to transport mystery and death with the help of a few grammatical forms.

I asked a man what was Right. He answered me that it was the assurance of the full exercise of possibilities. That man was called Galli Mathias. I ate him.

The only place there is no determinism is where there is mystery. But what has that to do with us?

Against the stories of men that begin in Cape Finisterre. The world without dates. Without rubrics. Without Napoleon. Without Caesar.

The fixation of progress by means of catalogues and television sets. Only with machinery. And blood transfusions.

Against antagonistic sublimations brought over in sailing ships.

Against the truth of the poor missionaries, defined through the wisdom of a cannibal, the Viscount of Cairo – It is a lie repeated many times.

But no crusaders came to us. They were fugitives from a civilization that we are eating up, because we are strong and as vindictive as the land turtles.

Only God is the conscience of the Uncreated Universe, Guaraci is the mother of all living creatures. Jaci is the mother of vegetables.

We never had any speculation. But we believed in divination. We had Politics, that is, the science of distribution. And a socio-planetary system.

Migrations. The flight from tedious states. Against urban scleroses. Against Conservatives and speculative boredom.

From William James and Voronoff. Transfiguration of taboo into totem. Cannibalism.

The pater familias is the creation of the stork fable: a real ignorance of things, a tale of imagination and a feeling of authority in front of curious crowds.

We have to start from a profound atheism in order to reach the idea of God. But the Cariba did not have to make anything precise. Because they had Guaraci.

The created object reacts like the Fallen Angel. Ever since, Moses has been wandering about. What is that to us?

Before two Portuguese discovered Brazil, Brazil discovered happiness.

Against the Indian de tocheiro. The Indian son of Mary, the godson of Catherine of Médicis and the son-in-law of Don Antonio de Mariz.

Happiness is the real proof.

No Pindorama matriarchy.

Against Memory the source of habit. Renewed for personal experience.

We are concrete. We take account of ideas, we react, we burn people in the public squares. We suppress ideas and other kinds of paralysis. Through screenplays. To believe in our signs, to believe in our instruments and our stars.

Against Goethe, against the mother of the Gracos, and the Court of Don Juan VI.

Happiness is the real proof.

The struggle between what we might call the Uncreated and the Created – illustrated by the permanent contradiction of man and his taboo. Daily love and the capitalist modus vivendi. Cannibalism. Absorption of the sacred enemy. To transform him into a totem. The human adventure. Earthly finality. However, only the pure elite manage to realize carnal cannibalism within, some sense of life, avoiding all the evils Freud identified, those religious evils. What yields nothing is a sublimation of the sexual instinct. It is a thermometric scale of cannibalist instinct. Once carnal, it turns elective and creates friendship. Affectivity, or love. Speculative, science. It deviates and transfers. We arrive at utter vilification. In base cannibalism, our baptized sins agglomerate – envy, usury, calumny, or murder. A plague from the so-called cultured and Christianized, it’s what we are acting against. Cannibals.

Against Anchieta singing the eleven thousand virgins in the land of Iracema – the patriarch Joa Ramalho the founder of Sao Paulo.

Our independence was never proclaimed. A typical phrase of Don Juan VI – My son, put this crown on your head, before some adventurer does it! We expel the dynasty. We have to get rid of the Braganza spirit, the ordinations and snuff of Maria da Fonte.

Against social reality, dressed and oppressive, defined by Freud – in reality we are complex, we are crazy, we are prostitutes and without prisons of the Pindorama matriarchy.




Note: *"The New Moon, or the Lua Nova, blows in Everyman remembrances of me" from The Savages, by Couto Magalhaes.

Cannibal Manifesto (also known as the Brazilwood Manifesto) was written in 1928 by Oswald de Andrade, a member of the Brazilian art movement known as Modernist, which began in 1923.

Sunday, February 7, 2010

Questions answered, Walter Benjamin's Essay

What is the "Aura" of a work of art?

The aura of a work of art is the time and space of it's presence. The space it exists in provides a distance between the observer and the artwork that allows contemplation. The aura is influenced by physical wear, damage, or change of ownership of the piece over the years. The original art piece has an aura that a reproduction does not. This makes the original authentic.

b) In Benji's mind, what effects did mechanical reproduction, such as film and the camera/photography, have on the viewer's perception of art?

Photography freed the hand from art processes and skills humans have been using throughout history. Looking in the camera lens, pointing a shooting sped the process of pictorial art-making just like film. Because the reproduced art piece is copiable, it can reach more people, eliminating the pilgrimage once taken by the viewer to go see a work. Multiplying the work spreads the "unique existence" of a piece thin, making it less authentic. An original film cannot be seen by multiple people, therefore, they will never experience the original aura of the film.

c) What is meant by the passage: "for the first time in world history, mechanical reproduction emancipates the work of art from its parasitical dependance on ritual."

He uses the example of the photo negative. One can make several prints from that negative, but there is no "original print," each one is the same. Maybe the negative is the original that holds the authenticity, but it is not a work of art...yet. Once an original and it's authenticity does not apply, it is freed from the ritualistic aspect of it, and instead it is based on politics.

d) What mechanically or otherwise reproductive processes are changing the face of art today?

Some reproduced art is cheapened by the quality of it's production. Makers sub out parts of their products, or even the whole thing to be reproduced elsewhere, sometimes cutting corners on quality to save and make more profit. I think the aura of a crappy object doesn't exist, therefore, the one purchasing it doesn't value it. It is disposable.
We also have the design aesthetic out there with digital fabrication, laser cutting and 3D modeling. Some people criticize art designed or produced this way, saying the artist's hand is further away from the artwork. There is precision in this work that the hand cannot achieve, and for me, this sometimes makes it cold and sterile. I appreciate some of this artwork, just as I do with all types art. I have no dislike for it. The computer is just a new tool we use to help fabricate. Whether its a computer program or a table saw, it is still technology. True, gross motor skills are not used with the computer, but lets not go into that now!

Sunday, January 31, 2010

Post Modern Assignment

List of Post-s:

post-apocalyptic
post-game recap
post-punk
post-delivery
post-war
post-election
post-operative
post-surgery
post-Marxism
post-pardum depression
post-coital
post-date
post-9/11
post-traumatic stress disorder
post-impressionism
post-nasal drip
post-structuralism
post-bellum
post-doctoral
post-feminism
post-facto
post-graduate
post-grunge
post-humanism
post-industrial society
post-mortem
post-minimalism
post-Zionism
post-menopausal
post-production
post-prandial



Define the Modern Art Movement:
The post modern art movement occurred approximately from the 1860s to the 1970s. While the industrial revolution began in the second part of the 1800s, new art styles and movements appeared reflecting the growing changes in society. Some of the modern art movements that emerged were Impressionism, Expressionism, Fauvism, Art Deco, Art Nouveau, Cubism, Surrealism, Pop-Art, OP-Art, and Abstract art.The ideas that led to modern art can be traced back to the 17th and 18th centuries during the Enlightenment. A controversial aspect of the modern movement was its rejection of tradition. Modernism stresses freedom of expression, experimentation, radicalism, while primitivism disregards conventional expectations. An important modern art critic was Clement Greenberg, who named Immanuel Kant "the first real Modernist." Greenberg (1909-1994) was known for promoting the abstract expressionist movement and was one of the first to praise the work of painter Jackson Pollock. One of the most prominent critics of abstract expressionism was New York Times art critic John Canaday, who started his career at the Times in 1959. Important artists of the modern art movement are Pablo Picasso, Henry Moore, Salvador Dali, Henri Matisse, and Jackson Pollock.


Henri Matisse, The Red Studio (1911)


Jackson Pollock, One: No 31 (1950)


Pablo Picasso, Les Demoiselles d'Avignon (1907)


Henry Moore, Reclining Figure (1929)


Marcel Duchamp, Fountain (1917)



Define the Post Modern Art Movement:
The shift from modern to post modern may have possibly started in Europe in 1914, and in the 1960s in the United States. Postmodernism describes movements that can arise from, react against, or reject aspects of modernism. By rejecting sovereign autonomous individuals, it puts an emphasis upon an anarchic collective and anonymous experience. Collage, diversity, the mystically unrepresentable, Dionysian passion are the focus of attention. There is also the dissolution of distinctions by the merging of subject and object, and the self and other. Critics include Jean Baudrillard, Helene Cixous who wrote "The Laugh of the Medusa," and Hal Foster who is author of books on post-modernism in art. Movements characterized as postmodern include Conceptual Art, Installation Art, Minimalism, Performance Art, Electronic Art, Computer Art, and Multimedia Art. Artists include: Andy Warhol, Yoko Ono, Jane Frank, Mel Chin, Judy Chicago, and Jeff Koons.


Andy Warhol, Marilyn Monroe Hot Pink (1967)


Judy Chicago, The Dinner Party (1975-79)


Yoko Ono, Exit (2008)


Jeff Koons, Ballon Dog Magenta, (1994-2000)


Jane Frank, Plum Point (1964)


Define the Art of this time: Neo-Decline
Everything is slowly crumbling. The ice caps are melting, 9/11, global warming, ocean trash islands, the recession, Heidi Montag gets plastic surgery at age 23. Nobody can afford art. But you can afford that $.99 mp3 minus the now archaic album cover art. What about music videos replaced with reality shows? Emp-tv. Artists flood academic art programs to escape the recession. We all are required to make blogs. We read art theory and criticism, and mill over old and recent ideas while trying to create new ones that don't resemble someone elses....even though we all know, "It has been done before." There is us, the arrogant educated art-speakers and the DYI, ETSYers who we try to separate from. All the great art movements are over, so we have to pick through the muddy waters of today to try to salvage something to make new. But who cares about you or me anyway, there are billions of people out there, many of whom born this very second, who want to become artists. Do we have enough room on our walls and shelves for more junk? Artists/critics include you, me, John Stewart, Al Gore, Michael Moore, Sasha Baron Cohen, Rush Limbaugh, Michael Pollan, and Pixar. Characteristics include heavy editing and airbrushing of celebrities in magazines, more plastic surgery and botox, 3-D movies and TV, text messaging and blogs for everyone.